Mulvaney Law Offices, PLLC

Lincoln County · Washington State

Uncontested Divorce by Mail

The easiest, cheapest, fastest, and most complete way to get divorced in Washington State — integrated with Estate Planning and covered by MetLife Legal Plans.

Washington State Law

No-Fault Divorce in Washington

Washington is a no-fault divorce state. Neither spouse needs to prove fault or wrongdoing — no infidelity, no abuse, no misconduct — to obtain a divorce. The only legal requirement is that one spouse states the marriage is "irretrievably broken." That is it. The court does not investigate why, and the other spouse cannot contest the divorce on the grounds that the marriage is not broken.

This simplifies the process enormously and reduces conflict by eliminating the need to assign blame. It also protects privacy — neither party is required to air grievances in open court.

From Christopher's Practice

I had a litigated divorce case in which the wife had a video of her husband cheating that she wanted to show to the Court. The Court not only did not permit the video to be shown — it forbade any mention of the existence of the video. The video was completely irrelevant to a litigated divorce in Washington.

Divorce by mail works differently. I had a divorce by mail case in which the husband felt bad about cheating on his wife and gave her several hundred thousand dollars. The Court signed the Decree and did not even know what the parties had agreed to — because the values of assets are not required to be disclosed in a divorce by mail. The parties resolved it themselves, privately, on their own terms.

— Christopher S. Mulvaney, Esq.

What No-Fault Means in Practice

  • Property divisionFault is generally not considered when dividing marital property. However, financial misconduct — such as deliberately hiding assets, dissipating the marital estate, or reducing income to avoid support obligations — can be considered by the court in limited circumstances.
  • Spousal maintenanceMarital misconduct such as adultery does not directly affect spousal support in Washington. The court focuses on financial need and the ability to pay — not on who did what to whom.
  • ChildrenA parent's misconduct may be considered only if it directly affects the children's health, safety, or welfare. The standard is the best interests of the child — not punishment of a parent.
  • Privacy and reduced conflictBy not requiring the airing of grievances, no-fault divorce helps maintain privacy and reduces the emotional and financial cost of the process. This is one of the reasons uncontested divorce by mail is so effective — the parties resolve their own affairs without a judge deciding for them.

Why Lincoln County

The Only Way Christopher Does Divorce

Christopher only does uncontested divorce by mail in Lincoln County on forms created through Washington Divorce Online (WDO), integrated with Estate Planning including Separate Property Revocable Living Trusts, Quitclaim Deeds, and Beneficiary Designations which give effect to your Agreement. This is the easiest, cheapest, fastest, and most complete way to get divorced in Washington — that is why he only does divorce that way.

If you wish to proceed another way for whatever reason — including if you want to preserve your rights to go back to Court for Post Decree Motions — Christopher wishes you the best of luck in finding another referral to assist you.

Lincoln County allows anyone who lives in any of the 39 Counties in Washington State to get divorced in Lincoln County. Only one party needs to live in Washington. Both parties consent to personal jurisdiction from anywhere in the world in Zoom via DocuSign.

Lincoln County vs. Litigation

Divorce by Mail vs. Litigated Divorce

Divorce by Mail — Lincoln County

~$600 total · ~90 days

ConvenienceAll documents filed by postal mail — no court appearances, no travel, no waiting rooms.
No parenting class requirementUnlike most counties, Lincoln County does not mandate parenting classes for divorcing couples with children.
Dramatically reduced costDivorce by Mail costs about $600. A litigated divorce could easily cost $30,000 — about 50 times more.
Fastest resolutionFinalized in the 90-day waiting period mandated by state law, plus mail transit time. That is the fastest you can get divorced in Washington.
Complete agreement enforced as writtenThe Court signs the documents exactly as prepared — with no changes ever. Your Agreement is 100% enforced.

Litigated Divorce — King County

$30,000+ · 1 year or more

Forum for resolving disagreementsIf spouses cannot agree on every issue, litigation allows a judge to impose a binding resolution.
Court protectionEspecially valuable when there are concerns about domestic violence, abuse, or financial instability — the court can issue protective orders and temporary custody and support orders.
Expert assistance for complex issuesAttorneys in King County can assist with business valuation, complex asset division, and other financial complexities.
Access to post-decree motionsFiling in your county of residence preserves your right to return to Court to enforce orders or resolve future disputes.

Disadvantages of litigation:

Much longer — a litigated divorce can take a year or more; Divorce by Mail takes just over 90 days
Much more expensive — attorney hourly rates in King County range from $400 to $700 or more; retainers of $5,000 to $10,000 or more are typical
More contentious — litigation is adversarial and especially harmful to children
Public record — court proceedings are generally open to the public

When Divorce by Mail Is Not Appropriate

Contested cases only — This option is only viable if both spouses agree in writing on absolutely every issue: property division, child custody, and support. If there is even one unresolved issue, Divorce by Mail is not appropriate.
Agreement must be voluntary — If either party is under duress, Divorce by Mail is not appropriate. Christopher had a case where a wife said she would agree to anything because she was afraid her husband would shoot her. A gun to your head is the definition of coercion. That client needed representation and advice regarding protective orders — not Divorce by Mail.
You are giving up the right to return to Court — Divorce by Mail in Lincoln County is for people who never want to see a judge — not before, during, or after the divorce. They want the signed Certified Copy of the Decree to arrive in the mail and will work everything out themselves with no further contact with the Court. If you foresee any future disputes that may require Court intervention, file in your county of residence instead.

"My job is spreading misery. If anyone leaves happy, I have failed." — Family Court Judge explaining his role.

If you and your spouse have reached a complete and amicable agreement on all aspects of the divorce and your case does not involve complex legal issues, Divorce by Mail in Lincoln County is the right choice. If there are disagreements or complexities, or you need legal protection before, during, or after your divorce, file in your county of residence.

Consider Legal Separation as an Option

It is important to consider legal separation as an option so that you make the best informed decision for yourselves. A contested divorce could cost thousands, or tens of thousands of dollars. A contested legal separation could cost thousands of dollars. You are saving a lot of money by mailing this yourself. Hopefully, some day, it will all be online.

Total Cost Breakdown

Washington Divorce Online (WDO)

Saves entering all information directly into PDF documents

$249

Court Filing Fee

Lincoln County Superior Court

$314

Presentation Fee

Required by the Court

$30

Copies

Court copies

$25

Total (not including postage)

MetLife covers all Attorney's Fees

$618

MetLife Legal Plans covers all Attorney's Fees. Under your MetLife Legal Plan there is no out-of-pocket expense for attorney's fees.

Important Instructions for WDO

USE YOUR FULL LEGAL NAME ON ALL FORMS.

USE THE INVENTORY SPREADSHEET FOR ASSETS AND DEBTS.

JUST LIST A CHECKING ACCOUNT IN WDO — the Inventory Spreadsheet handles everything else.

You must submit your file within 60 days or you will lose access.

When you submit you are finished — WDO will send an email if what you submitted is complete, or ask you to add information.

Christopher can edit the PDF documents with you in Zoom.

Email the PDF attachments from WDO to Christopher once you receive them.

The Process — Step by Step

01

Complete & Return the Intake Form

Complete and return the Intake Form. Once received, further instructions about the process will be sent.

Download Intake Form
02

Create an Account at Washington Divorce Online (WDO)

Create a free account at Washington Divorce Online (WDO) and enter your information. Use your full legal name on all forms. Just list a checking account in WDO — the Inventory Spreadsheet handles all other assets and debts. You must submit your file within 60 days or you will lose access. Email the PDF attachments from WDO once you receive them.

Washington Divorce Online (WDO)
03

Complete the Inventory Spreadsheet

List all assets and debts on the Inventory Spreadsheet. There are three purposes: (1) to show fair and equitable distribution of community property; (2) to protect you after the divorce from potential claims; and (3) so you can just list your checking and savings accounts on the petition — Christopher will write "see Exhibits A & B" for the rest. No dollar values will appear on the Divorce Petition, but dollar values will be on the spreadsheet. Only the name and last 4 digits of each account number are required on the court exhibits.

04

Receive Draft Separate Estate Plans

A draft of your Separate Estate Plans will be emailed for review before the Zoom meeting. Creating two separate property trusts gives you the opportunity to use the asset and debt exhibits as exhibits of your separate property trusts — the spreadsheet inventories do double duty as court exhibits and trust exhibits.

05

Zoom Meeting — Review, Revise & Sign

All questions are answered in the Zoom meeting. Any necessary changes are made. Documents are signed and notarized via DocuSign in Zoom. You are free to sign all, none, or any combination of the draft documents.

06

Mail Documents to the Court

After signing, you mail the documents to Lincoln County Superior Court. The Court signs the documents exactly as prepared — with no changes ever. That makes your Agreement 100% enforced.

Integration with Postnuptial Agreements

A third thing Christopher does that is not commonly seen among Postnuptial Agreement attorneys is to explain that he does uncontested divorce by mail in Lincoln County — which does not require revealing the value of assets and debts, just the last 4 digits of the account number. The Court signs the documents exactly as prepared, with no changes ever. That makes your Agreement 100% enforced. Learn more about Postnuptial Agreements.

Why It Works

The Court Signs It Exactly the Way You Wrote It

By submitting a Joint Petition for Divorce when all of the facts and circumstances relating to the marriage are known, the Court will sign off on what the parties want. This is especially true because the values of the assets are not required on the Joint Petition — the Court has no way of knowing what the actual property division is.

If the parties want an enforceable agreement in the event of divorce, they should get an Uncontested Divorce by Mail in Lincoln County pursuant to RCW 26.09.030.

Before mailing a Joint Petition for Divorce, the parties may enter into a Separation Agreement under RCW 26.09.070 (Separation Contracts), which forms the basis of the Joint Petition. That way, the parties can try out their agreement first — before mailing it to the Court and making it a Final Order after 90 days.

Warning: Contested Divorce

The Divorce Court has a statutory duty to make a fair and equitable distribution of community property and will do so in a contested divorce regardless of any Prenuptial or Postnuptial Agreement between the parties — which will be declared void to the extent it conflicts with the Court's Property Settlement Order. Courts have broad discretion to determine what is "fair, just and equitable under all the circumstances" under RCW 26.09.080.

If you wish to preserve your rights to go back to Court for Post Decree Motions, or if you wish to proceed another way for any reason, Christopher wishes you the best of luck in finding another referral to assist you.

Washington Law

Spousal Fiduciary Duties & the Duty to Support

Spouses owe each other the highest fiduciary duty of utmost good faith. This includes four distinct duties:

  • Duty of Care: Including diligence and independent judgment.
  • Duty of Loyalty: Including acting in the best interest of the spouse, and not permitting self-interest to adversely affect a spouse.
  • Duty of Obedience: A spouse must stay true to the mission of creating and protecting the marital community.
  • Duty to Share Relevant Information: Including not lying by omission.

A fundamental of marriage that parties are not free to contract around is the Duty to Support each other. A married person's spouse is the only person with whom a legal lifetime mutual Duty of Support exists. Spouses can be ordered to pay lifetime spousal support in a divorce after a long-term marriage if the need of one spouse and the means of the other are sufficient.

Because of this, Christopher recommends holding the marital home in both spouses' names as a married couple. This creates a joint tenancy with right of survivorship — meaning that if one spouse passes away, the surviving spouse records the death certificate of the deceased spouse and the property is re-titled in the name of the surviving spouse as their sole and separate property.

The Inventory Spreadsheet

Fair & Equitable Distribution of Assets and Debts

Christopher only handles uncontested divorce by mail, which requires an asset and debt spreadsheet. The spreadsheet formulas automatically calculate the sum of assets and debts and the difference between the two parties. The difference should be close to zero — except for property owned before marriage, inheritance received during marriage, and property acquired after separation.

The spreadsheet documents that the parties have made a fair and equitable distribution of assets and debts. It also does double duty: the same asset and debt information is used as exhibits for the Separate Property Trusts — so the information you gather for the divorce is identical to what is needed for estate planning, and it is easier to gather and less confrontational in the estate planning context.

Estate planning becomes highly relevant after divorce. Doing the two things together makes sense since the asset and debt information is identical for both purposes.

Note on dual representation: The process of having one lawyer represent both parties for estate planning means Christopher cannot represent either party against the other — ever. This encourages voluntary agreement, because he loses two clients if the parties cannot agree on everything related to the divorce.

How Property is Owned

Community Property, Title & Separate Property

Married people are free to title property however they want. This can be useful in preparation for separation or divorce. The Community Property Presumption still applies no matter how the property is titled — so the party giving a title interest is in no way prejudiced regarding a community property equity interest in the property.

For example, if one party has significant debts and the couple chooses to title the house and all other property in the name of the spouse without debts, that may reduce anxiety in the marriage without interfering with that spouse's right to claim an undivided half of the community property equity.

What is Community Property?

Community property is everything you acquire between the date of marriage and the date one party moves out of the marital home — or the filing of a Legal Separation or Divorce Petition. Exceptions: gifts, inheritance, and personal injury damages received during the marriage remain separate property.

For example, if one spouse is hit by a car in a crosswalk and badly injured, the damages awarded by the court can be placed into a Separate Property Trust Account and kept separate. The same is true for a large birthday gift or money received after the death of a parent.

The "Theoretical Right" to Separate Property

Christopher calls the right of married people to own separate property a theoretical right — because of a case in which the wife said to the husband about his inheritance: "You can have separate property or you can be married to me, but you can't have both." As a practical matter, separate property during marriage requires the consent of your spouse.

A Note on Women & Separate Property

At the time of the Founding of the United States, women could not receive their own inheritance from their parents — it went to their husband. This is what happened to Martha Washington. Martha did receive one-third of her first husband's estate (the other two-thirds going to her two young children), but when she married George, he owned what she had before she met him.

That is why Christopher is a strong proponent of women holding their own property in Separate Property Trusts that become irrevocable upon death — meaning they cannot be changed by anyone, not even a judge. This protects women against losing property during marriage or in divorce, and allows women to pass assets to their children rather than to a surviving husband who may remarry and redirect those assets. Children who become stepchildren in a remarriage may be disinherited.

Veuve Clicquot — the French Champagne house founded in 1772 — is a striking example. Veuve is French for widow. Madame Clicquot never remarried after her husband's death because she did not want to lose the ability to run the Champagne house, which she would have been required to surrender under the paternalistic laws of the time. Today, women can maintain their separate property during marriage and hold all the same rights of ownership and use that men have. Christopher encourages women to take advantage of these hard-won rights — so that they may not atrophy from disuse.

Title & Survivorship

Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship (JTWROS)

JTWROS is the way married people in Washington hold title to real estate just by virtue of being married. When one spouse dies, the surviving spouse sends Christopher the death certificate and Zelle's $50 — Christopher electronically records a cover sheet and the death certificate, the County Recorder removes the deceased spouse's name, and the property is re-titled in the name of the surviving spouse as sole and separate property. No probate is needed for married people in Washington to receive clear title to real estate.

For unmarried co-owners, the words "as Joint Tenants with Right of Survivorship" must follow the names on the deed. Without those words, Tenancy in Common is presumed — meaning the surviving partner may face a dispute over the deceased partner's half of the property.

Key Features of JTWROS

  • Right of SurvivorshipThe deceased owner's share transfers automatically to the surviving owner(s) once the death certificate and cover sheet are recorded. Death certificates cost $50 to record; deeds cost $400.
  • Equal OwnershipAll joint tenants hold equal shares and have equal rights to use and enjoy the property. All tenants must agree in writing to any refinance or sale.
  • Avoids ProbateProperty passes directly to the surviving owner, bypassing probate — which takes a minimum of 6 months, costs a minimum of $2,500, and requires public disclosure of asset values.
  • Shared ResponsibilityJoint owners share equal responsibility for property taxes and maintenance. Those who signed the Promissory Note are liable for the mortgage debt — title and the Note are independent.

⚠ Critical Warning for Divorcing Couples

Changing title does not change the Note. If a spouse is removed from title pursuant to a divorce, their liability on the Promissory Note continues until the property is refinanced or sold — no matter how many decades that takes. A Quitclaim Deed transfers ownership; it does not release mortgage liability.

JTWROS vs. Tenancy in Common

In a Tenancy in Common, owners can hold unequal shares and there is no right of survivorship. The deceased owner's share passes to their heirs under the Intestacy Statute or through a validated Will admitted to Probate — not automatically to the surviving co-owner. Unmarried couples who intend survivorship must use the explicit JTWROS language on the deed.

The Four Unities Required for JTWROS

Unity of Time

All joint tenants must acquire their interest at the same time.

Unity of Title

All joint tenants must obtain ownership through the same legal document.

Unity of Interest

Each joint tenant must hold an equal share of the property.

Unity of Possession

All joint tenants must have equal right to possess and use the entire property.

Statutory authority: RCW 64.28.010 — Joint tenancies with right of survivorship authorized; methods of creation; creditors' rights saved.

Dividing Retirement Accounts

Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO)

A QDRO is a court order that creates or recognizes a right to a portion of a participant's retirement plan benefits for an "alternate payee" — typically the non-employee spouse. It legally divides 401(k)s, pensions, and other ERISA-governed retirement plans in a divorce, allowing the alternate payee to receive their share without the participant incurring early withdrawal penalties or taxes.

Without a QDRO, a divorce decree alone may not grant the alternate payee the right to receive benefits directly from the plan. ERISA-governed plans require a QDRO — the decree is not sufficient on its own.

What a QDRO Does

  • Divides 401(k)s, pensions, and Thrift Savings Plans (TSPs)
  • Names the non-employee spouse as "alternate payee"
  • Specifies the amount or percentage of benefits to be paid
  • Avoids early withdrawal penalties and taxes on the transfer
  • Protects the plan participant from tax liability on distributions to the alternate payee

The Process (Lincoln County)

  • Obtain the QDRO form from the custodian of the 401(k) account
  • Sign the form electronically
  • Christopher notarizes electronically as a Remote Online Notary
  • Submit to Lincoln County Court to be signed with the Divorce Decree

⚠ Critical Warning

If you do not give the completed QDRO to the 401(k) custodian to keep in their records, it is not binding upon them — and retirement funds can be distributed without regard to the QDRO. Delivery to the plan custodian is a required final step.

Strategic note: If it is possible to avoid a QDRO by giving home equity or other assets to the other spouse instead, that may be preferable to being saddled with reduced retirement income for the rest of your life. This is worth discussing carefully before finalizing the asset distribution.

Tax Considerations

Key Tax Issues in a Washington Divorce

Divorce has significant tax consequences that are easy to overlook when focused on reaching an agreement. Understanding these issues before finalizing a settlement can prevent costly surprises.

Asset Division & Cost Basis

  • Transfers are tax-free at the time of transferUnder IRC §1041, transferring assets between spouses — or former spouses incident to a divorce — does not trigger capital gains tax at the time of transfer.
  • Cost basis carries overThe receiving spouse inherits the original cost basis of the asset and assumes the potential tax liability when they later sell it.
  • Unequal after-tax valueTwo assets with the same current market value may have vastly different after-tax values. An asset with a low cost basis will result in a larger capital gains tax when sold — making it less valuable than an asset with a higher basis.
  • Home sale — $500,000 exclusionIf the marital home is sold before the divorce is finalized, both spouses may qualify for a $500,000 capital gains exclusion filing jointly. After divorce, each spouse can typically only exclude $250,000 individually. Selling in the tax year before the divorce is finalized preserves the full exclusion.
  • Buyouts are not taxable eventsIf one spouse buys out the other's share of the home, the selling spouse does not owe capital gains tax on the buyout — it is treated as a property transfer, not a sale to a third party.
  • Retirement accounts require a QDRODivision of 401(k)s and pensions requires a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to ensure a tax-free transfer. IRA assets can be transferred tax-free through a trustee-to-trustee transfer specified in the divorce decree.
  • Early withdrawal penaltiesTaking a cash distribution from a retirement account as part of a settlement triggers income tax and a 10% early withdrawal penalty — except for certain QDRO-related distributions before age 59½.

Alimony & Child Support — Post-2018 TCJA Rules

  • Alimony is no longer deductibleFor divorce or separation agreements executed after December 31, 2018, alimony is no longer tax-deductible for the payer and is not taxable income for the recipient. This is a significant change that affects cash flow and should be central to settlement negotiations.
  • Child support has never been deductibleChild support payments are not tax-deductible for the payer and are not taxable income for the recipient — this rule has not changed.

Filing Status & Dependency Exemptions

  • Year-end marital status controls filing statusA taxpayer's marital status on December 31 determines their filing status for the entire year. If divorced by year-end, clients must file as Single or Head of Household. If not yet divorced, they may file Married Filing Jointly or Married Filing Separately.
  • Head of HouseholdFiling as Head of Household offers a higher standard deduction than Single and is available to separated individuals who pay more than half the household costs and have a qualifying dependent child.
  • Child tax creditsThe custodial parent is typically entitled to claim child-related tax benefits. Parents can agree for the non-custodial parent to claim the child, but the custodial parent must provide a signed IRS Form 8332 every year.

Other Key Considerations

  • Tax debt and Innocent Spouse ReliefA divorce decree dividing tax debt does not bind the IRS. If a former spouse fails to pay their share of a joint tax debt, the IRS can still seek payment from the other party. Innocent Spouse Relief may be available — consult a tax professional.
  • Legal fees are generally non-deductibleThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) suspended the ability to deduct legal fees related to tax advice or alimony for tax years 2018–2025. Nearly all divorce legal fees are now non-deductible personal expenses.
  • Professional advice is essentialA tax professional should review any settlement agreement before it is finalized to identify unforeseen tax liabilities and ensure an equitable after-tax division of assets.

Estate Planning After Divorce

Beneficiary Designations & RCW 11.07.010

One of the most overlooked — and most consequential — estate planning issues in a Washington divorce is what happens to beneficiary designations on life insurance, retirement accounts, payable-on-death bank accounts, and annuities. Many people forget to update these designations after divorce, which can result in a former spouse receiving assets that were never intended for them.

Washington State has addressed this directly through RCW 11.07.010, which automatically revokes beneficiary designations in favor of a former spouse upon divorce or termination of a registered domestic partnership.

How RCW 11.07.010 Works

  • Automatic RevocationThe statute automatically revokes provisions in written instruments made before a divorce that favor a former spouse for the payment or transfer of nonprobate assets at death — without any action required by the divorced spouse.
  • Legal FictionIt operates under the legal fiction that the former spouse died at the time of the dissolution decree. The nonprobate asset passes as if the former spouse had not survived the decedent.
  • Applicable AssetsCovers life insurance policies, pension plans, payable-on-death (POD) bank accounts, annuities, and individual retirement accounts (IRAs) — any nonprobate asset with a beneficiary designation.
  • ExceptionsAutomatic revocation does not apply if: (1) the written instrument expressly states otherwise; (2) a divorce settlement agreement governs the disposition of the asset; or (3) the former spouse is redesignated as beneficiary after the divorce.

Why It Matters

  • Prevents unintended inheritances by former spouses when individuals forget to update designations
  • Protects intended heirs — especially children — from being unintentionally disinherited
  • Reduces legal disputes by providing a clear default rule at the time of dissolution
  • Encourages proactive estate plan updates after every major life change

⚠ The ERISA Exception

  • RCW 11.07.010 cannot override pension plans governed by ERISA — federal law takes precedence
  • For ERISA plans (most 401(k)s and employer pensions), a pre-divorce beneficiary designation usually remains valid unless the participant actively changes it
  • This is why a QDRO — and a new beneficiary designation filed with the plan custodian — are both essential steps in any divorce involving a 401(k)

Action required after every divorce: Even though RCW 11.07.010 provides automatic protection for Washington nonprobate assets, you should still update every beneficiary designation after your divorce is final — especially on ERISA-governed retirement accounts, which are not covered by the statute. Christopher reviews beneficiary designations as part of every post-divorce estate plan.

Child & Spousal Support

Imputed Income in Washington Divorce

Imputed income is one of the most consequential — and least understood — concepts in Washington divorce law. A court can assign a higher income to a party for the purpose of calculating child support or spousal maintenance, even if that party is not actually earning that amount. The goal is to prevent a spouse from voluntarily reducing their income to minimize their financial obligations to their children or former partner.

What Imputed Income Means in Court

The court concludes that a party has an earning capacity greater than their current income, and uses that higher figure when calculating support payments — regardless of what the party is actually earning.

  • Voluntary unemploymentQuitting a high-paying job for a lower-paying one without a valid reason, or refusing available work entirely.
  • Voluntary underemploymentIntentionally reducing work hours, declining a promotion, or accepting a position well below your demonstrated earning capacity.
  • Failure to seek workFailing to make diligent efforts to find new employment after a job loss — particularly when the job market supports re-employment.
  • Hidden or unreported incomeFailing to disclose income sources, assets, or cash compensation that would otherwise be included in the support calculation.

Factors the Court Considers

When determining earning capacity, a Washington court looks at the full picture of a party's circumstances:

  • Skills, work history, and education level
  • The local job market and availability of positions in their field
  • Age and physical or mental health
  • Childcare responsibilities and their effect on availability to work

Vocational Expert Testimony

In contested cases, either party may retain a vocational expert to provide a professional opinion on earning capacity. The expert reviews the party's education, work history, skills, and the local job market — and testifies to what the party could reasonably earn. This adds to legal costs but can be decisive when one party claims they cannot earn more than they currently do.

⚠ Financial Consequences

If a court imputes income, the affected party must pay support based on income they are not actually receiving — which can create serious financial hardship. Child support is statutory and cannot be bargained away in exchange for property concessions. It belongs to the children, not to the parties.

Note: Imputed income calculations are fact-specific and depend heavily on the evidence presented. Christopher recommends full financial disclosure and proactive documentation of any legitimate reason for reduced income — such as a medical condition, caregiving responsibilities, or a genuine job search — before the issue reaches a judge.

Financial Considerations

Bankruptcy & Divorce in Washington State

Bankruptcy and divorce are frequently interconnected in Washington State. Financial struggles can both lead to and be exacerbated by marital dissolution — and the interaction between the two legal processes requires careful planning.

Why Divorce & Financial Distress Are Linked

  • Financial stress and marital conflictMoney problems are a leading source of marital stress and a common driver of divorce.
  • Two households, doubled expensesDivorce means creating two separate households — doubling rent or mortgage payments and often reducing overall household income at the same time.
  • Community property debt divisionWashington is a community property state. Debts incurred during the marriage to support the marital community belong to both spouses. Dividing those debts can be complex and contentious — particularly when refinancing is not an option.
  • Impact on credit scoresJoint accounts and co-signed loans can damage both parties' credit scores during and after divorce, especially if one spouse stops making payments. A lower credit score makes it harder to qualify for new loans and further destabilizes finances.
  • Legal and court feesThe divorce process itself adds to financial strain — attorney fees, court costs, and filing fees all accumulate.
  • Child support and alimony obligationsFor the paying spouse, these obligations can significantly reduce disposable income and make it difficult to cover basic living expenses.

Timing of Bankruptcy — Before or After Divorce?

The timing of a bankruptcy filing relative to a divorce can significantly affect the outcome of both proceedings. Filing before the divorce can simplify debt division and potentially make the divorce process smoother — but the right answer depends on individual circumstances.

  • Means test and family sizeThe bankruptcy means test compares income to the median income for a household of the same size in Washington State. A family of four has a higher median income threshold than two families of two, a single person, or a family of three. Filing before or after divorce changes the household size used in the calculation — which can determine eligibility for Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13.
  • Joint filing before divorceSpouses can file a joint bankruptcy petition before divorcing, potentially discharging shared debts together and simplifying the subsequent divorce. This eliminates the need to divide many debts in the divorce decree.
  • Filing after divorceFiling individually after divorce allows each spouse to address their own financial situation separately, but community property debts may still affect both parties even after the divorce is final — in the eyes of the creditor, the divorce decree does not eliminate their right to collect from either spouse.

Important Considerations

  • Community property liability survives divorceIn Washington, one spouse can still be held responsible for debts the other incurred during the marriage — even after the divorce is final. The divorce decree binds the spouses to each other, but it does not bind creditors.
  • Refinancing and indemnification clausesTo mitigate risk, spouses can refinance joint loans into individual names and include indemnification clauses in the divorce decree — requiring the responsible party to compensate the other for any financial harm if they default. In practice, however, the defaulting party often does not have the money to pay, making any court judgment uncollectible.
  • Post-divorce litigation harms childrenParents returning to court to collect money from each other after a divorce can be deeply damaging to minor children. Indemnification clauses are a legal remedy — but the human cost of enforcing them should be weighed carefully.
  • Professional guidance is essentialThe interplay between bankruptcy and divorce law is complex. Consult both a bankruptcy attorney and a divorce attorney before making any decisions. Christopher handles the divorce side — a separate bankruptcy attorney should advise on the bankruptcy strategy.

When Children Are Involved

Child Support & Parenting Plans

Child support and parenting plans are an additional layer of complexity with their own sets of forms. Christopher recommends addressing the property and debt issues and estate planning issues before tackling the child-related issues — for two reasons:

  • Public policy against trading: There is a public policy against trading property and debt concessions in exchange for anything related to children. Child support is statutory and cannot be bargained in exchange for any other benefit to the parties — because child support does not belong to the parties. It belongs to the children.
  • Practice makes agreement more likely: The child-related issues tend to be the most difficult. By first practicing communication and reaching agreement on property and debt issues — and agreeing on the importance of estate planning for the protection of children — agreement on child-related issues becomes more likely.

Christopher's Philosophy

The Cheapest, Fastest, Least Contentious Way — First

Christopher's philosophy is that trying to reach a resolution in the cheapest, fastest, least contentious way possible is best for many people — and is a good place to start. You can always retain counsel to represent you and only you if this process does not work for your situation.

If you have MetLife Legal Insurance, you can go to the MetLife website and look for family law attorneys. You should be able to find someone whose practice focus is consistent with what you need. It is important to have a good match between your goals and the lawyer best suited to help you achieve them.

If divorce is ever something you are considering, the process of creating separate property trusts, postnuptial agreements, and a proposed division of assets and debts can be helpful to reduce anxiety in marriage — and also make an uncontested divorce more likely if it comes to that.

This process works very well for certain people, but does not work for everyone.

Christopher's Philosophy on Divorce

I believe that divorce is too common, and too broadly contested. It is in the best interests of children and spouses to resolve family law issues by agreement rather than litigation. Stipulation is by far the least expensive way to resolve domestic issues.

If the parties have decided to divorce and choose me as their lawyer, I will do the best I can to assist them in reaching an agreement on all issues related to their case. If such an agreement cannot be reached, for whatever reason, the parties must find separate representation. I am not permitted to represent either party at that point because the case becomes a contested matter requiring one party to serve the Divorce Petition on the other, and the other to file an Answer.

If a Joint Petition Divorce is something you think is not possible in your case, you should seek other counsel to litigate on your behalf. If you think a Joint Petition Divorce is likely in your case and wish to put forth your best effort to achieving an agreed uncontested resolution, I will be happy to assist you.

Once the Petition for Dissolution is electronically filed, you wait 90 days before the Decree can be submitted to the Court for signature by the Judge or Commissioner. Normally, no appearance in Court is necessary. A certified copy of the Decree can be ordered online at the time of submission and mailed to you. If you disagree on any issues, or have children, you cannot use the joint petition form.

Divorce and Bankruptcy

Divorce and bankruptcy are frequently intertwined. It is important to understand that a divorce decree does not alter the rights of third parties such as creditors — regardless of who is assigned a particular debt in the decree. A creditor can still collect from either spouse, no matter what the family court ordered.

Liability for a debt to a former spouse is generally dischargeable in bankruptcy. That means the assignment of debt by the family court may have little or no actual effect on who ultimately pays the debt. An analysis of each party's eligibility for Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 is needed to determine who will pay creditors, how much, and over what time period.

Child support and spousal maintenance are not dischargeable in bankruptcy — so it is critical to understand how a payment obligation to or from a spouse is characterized before filing.

If you have questions about how divorce may impact bankruptcy, or vice versa, ask Christopher. The interaction between these two areas of law is one of the most consequential and least understood in family financial planning.

Divorce and Estate Planning

Divorce and revised estate planning should always go together. There are three reasons this matters immediately:

1. Control over your children's inheritance. Most people do not want their former spouse to have control of the money they leave to their minor children if they should die. That is exactly what happens if a Trust is not created for the benefit of the children with a Successor Trustee other than the former spouse.

2. Control over your medical care during the divorce process. Most people do not want their soon-to-be former spouse to have authority over their medical decisions if they need a health care agent at any point during the divorce proceedings. Your existing Health Care Directive likely names your spouse. It should be updated immediately.

3. Blended family conflicts. Conflicts between a surviving spouse and children from a previous marriage can be mitigated or avoided by providing for the needs of each in a way that does not require them to compete with one another for resources.

Beneficiary Designations. Life insurance, IRAs, and 401(k) beneficiary designations must be reviewed and updated in the divorce context. Washington's RCW 11.07.010 automatically revokes beneficiary designations in favor of a former spouse — but other inadvertent disinheritance issues can arise if the designation is not changed to a Trust after the divorce is final.

The consequences of failing to update an estate plan after divorce can be severe and irreversible. The cases of Anna Nicole Smith (Stern v. Marshall), Philip Seymour Hoffman, James Gandolfini, Amy Winehouse, Paul Walker, and Casey Kasem are among the most well-known examples of estate planning failures in the divorce and remarriage context — each resulting in years of litigation and millions of dollars in legal fees that proper planning would have prevented.

Ready to Get Started?

Once you have completed and returned the Intake Form (PDF) or the Online Intake Form, I will prepare a draft of an Estate Plan for your review, and schedule a no-cost, no-obligation Zoom consultation with Christopher Mulvaney to discuss your estate planning needs. I will answer all of your questions — in a calm, confidential conversation about what matters most to your family.

Share